A new Justice Department and FBI review has found no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein kept a “client list” of powerful associates, according to a memo reviewed by ABC News.
This revelation contradicts long-standing claims that Epstein maintained a secret list to allegedly blackmail or conspire with influential individuals in his trafficking schemes.
Joan Breland Obituary: Beloved Grenada Resident Passes Away at 88
DOJ and FBI Review Finds No “Client List”
The extensive review was ordered under leadership appointed by former President Donald Trump and aimed to clarify long-swirling conspiracy theories around Epstein’s network.
The department also released video footage as part of its findings, confirming that Epstein died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019. This directly challenges widespread speculation that Epstein was murdered to silence him.
Pam Bondi Under Fire for Previous Statements
Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi is now facing backlash for her earlier statements about possessing documents connected to Epstein’s alleged client list.
In February, Bondi appeared on Fox News and claimed there were “a lot of documents” related to Epstein on her desk awaiting review. Speaking from the Conservative Political Action Conference, Bondi stated:
“It’s sitting on my desk right now to review; that has been a directive by President Trump. I’m reviewing that, I’m reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That’s all in the process of being reviewed, because that was done at the directive of the president.”
She further emphasized:
“Donald Trump doesn’t make empty promises. I think promises made, promises kept. And that’s why we’re all there to carry out his directive about making America safe and prosperous.”
Public Reaction: “Was She Lying?”
With the DOJ and FBI now officially stating no client list exists, social media users have erupted with criticism and skepticism.
One X (formerly Twitter) post questioned:
“Pam Bondi said the Epstein client list was on her desk to review for release to the public just a few months ago. Now the DOJ she leads claims there’s no list. Sorry, but this is unacceptable. Was she lying then or is she lying now? We deserve answers.”
Many users echoed similar sentiments:
- “Her original statement was that she had the list. This is not a good look as she’s going back on her word.”
- “Maybe the list contained foreign dignitaries the government decided not to expose? If so, the US couldn’t prosecute them anyway.”
- “Why would she lie about this? What’s the motive? Who is really behind all of this?”
- “I had faith in this administration to be transparent. This sucks so bad.”
- “She’s always been a liar.”
Some tried to rationalize, suggesting Bondi may have been misled or received incomplete information, but frustration and demands for transparency dominate the conversation.
Conclusion: Unanswered Questions Linger
Despite the DOJ’s official findings, the controversy over Jeffrey Epstein’s potential connections continues to fuel public distrust. Bondi’s statements have only added to the confusion and suspicion, leaving many Americans demanding clarity and accountability.
As the investigation’s findings settle, one thing is clear: the public’s desire for transparency and truth remains as strong as ever.